Travel ban in effect; Supreme Court to decide

[oncemoreuntothejimbreech]

(06-27-2017, 07:27 PM)StLucieBengal Wrote: As of august only 36% of Americans wanted to accept Syrian "refugees"  .... it's not a popular issue here because they are not legitimate refugees.   Everyone knows they are displaced persons or economic migrants.    

The only ones denying this here are people who wish to open our borders and let the world flood in with a bunch of third worlders.

Not according to the definition you yourself provided.

[Vas Deferens]

(06-27-2017, 07:34 PM)StLucieBengal Wrote: Hey VD, what you do on your own time is your business.

spewing bs uncontrollably can come back to bite a poor sheltered beta in the depends. thought you'd learn your lesson and come back with another alt this time. guess you value those points too much.

[oncemoreuntothejimbreech]

(06-27-2017, 07:27 PM)StLucieBengal Wrote: As of august only 36% of Americans wanted to accept Syrian "refugees"  .... it's not a popular issue here because they are not legitimate refugees.   Everyone knows they are displaced persons or economic migrants.

The only ones denying this here are people who wish to open our borders and let the world flood in with a bunch of third worlders.

(06-27-2017, 11:25 PM)StLucieBengal Wrote: Syrians are not economic migrants.   That would be the Africans and non Syrians who are trying to claim refugee status.

WTH?

[hollodero]

(06-27-2017, 07:27 PM)StLucieBengal Wrote: As of august only 36% of Americans wanted to accept Syrian "refugees"  .... it's not a popular issue here because they are not legitimate refugees.   Everyone knows they are displaced persons or economic migrants.    

(06-27-2017, 11:25 PM)StLucieBengal Wrote: Syrians are not economic migrants. 

[StLucieBengal]

(06-27-2017, 11:49 PM)oncemoreuntothejimbreech Wrote: Not according to the definition you yourself provided.

Syrians who flee because of bombing are not refugees. They are displaced. They aren't being slaughtered for their religion or race. They are just trying to use the situation as their golden ticket to the west. We do not need or want them.

Economic migrants are all these Africans and others. Depends on where in Syria these people come from.

[hollodero]

(06-28-2017, 12:50 AM)StLucieBengal Wrote: Syrians who flee because of bombing are not refugees.  They are displaced.    They aren't being slaughtered for their religion or race.   They are just trying to use the situation as their golden ticket to the west.   We do not need or want them.

Economic migrants are all these Africans and others.   Depends on where in Syria these people come from.

So on what grounds did the 400.000 people get slaughtered? And why are the reasons for said slaughter no reason to call escaping people "refugees"? You do know that religion might be a reason for that slaughter, or political views, or speaking your mind, or just that you're in the wrong clan, lived in the wrong area, belong to the wrong ethnicity? You do have an idea what goes on in Syria, what a civil war is, don't you?
And they see a golden ticket, you say? You think they are happy that their home gets devastated, their friends and families murdered? Because now they can ive in an asylum seekers hostel with no perspective in a hostile environment of a strange culture? 
Hooray?

Your post is astonishingly unempathic. I can get why one might be opposed to taking in muslim refugees. But that is over the top scornful.

[StLucieBengal]

(06-28-2017, 01:11 AM)hollodero Wrote: So on what grounds did the 400.000 people get slaughtered? And why are the reasons for said slaughter no reason to call escaping people "refugees"? You do know that religion might be a reason for that slaughter, or political views, or speaking your mind, or just that you're in the wrong clan, lived in the wrong area, belong to the wrong ethnicity? You do have an idea what goes on in Syria, what a civil war is, don't you?
And they see a golden ticket, you say? You think they are happy that their home gets devastated, their friends and families murdered? Because now they can ive in an asylum seekers hostel with no perspective in a hostile environment of a strange culture? 
Hooray?

Your post is astonishingly unempathic. I can get why one might be opposed to taking in muslim refugees. But that is over the top scornful.

They are displaced persons. And I do feel bad for their homes being destroyed but that's a Syrian problem and as Syrians they can rebuild. Non of this requires taking any of them into our country. We can send them some resources, but outside of that.... it's on them.

[GMDino]

(06-28-2017, 01:18 AM)StLucieBengal Wrote: They are displaced persons.   And I do feel bad for their homes being destroyed but that's a Syrian problem and as Syrians they can rebuild.    Non of this requires taking any of them into our country.   We can send them some resources, but outside of that....   it's on them.

Don't like your job? Move.

Want better health care? Move.

Being slaughtered because of your political beliefs? Better hang around and rebuild your home.  Don't be bringing that stuff outside of your home country.

[oncemoreuntothejimbreech]

(06-28-2017, 12:50 AM)StLucieBengal Wrote: Syrians who flee because of bombing are not refugees.  They are displaced.    They aren't being slaughtered for their religion or race.   They are just trying to use the situation as their golden ticket to the west.   We do not need or want them.

Economic migrants are all these Africans and others.   Depends on where in Syria these people come from.

Again, you're incorrect.  They have been killed for their religion as well as dissenting political opinions.  They are displaced if they are still inside the Syrian borders.  You read the definition.  You provided the definition.  This tap dance they don't fit the definition you provided is unbecoming.  Especially in light of the fact the UN considers them refugees under the definition you provided.  

[GMDino]

Another winner of the "Golden Ticket" to the US.

[oncemoreuntothejimbreech]

(06-28-2017, 01:18 AM)StLucieBengal Wrote: They are displaced persons.   And I do feel bad for their homes being destroyed but that's a Syrian problem and as Syrians they can rebuild.    Non of this requires taking any of them into our country.   We can send them some resources, but outside of that....   it's on them.

And just yesterday you were singing the praises of Jesus the Alpha.  I don't think that is the kind of example He set.

[Vas Deferens]

(06-28-2017, 01:51 AM)oncemoreuntothejimbreech Wrote: And just yesterday you were singing the praises of Jesus the Alpha.  I don't think that is the kind of example He set.

Some betas are busy hiding behind gates and patrolling the gated neighborhood with a holstered pea shooter for no discernible reason.

[StLucieBengal]

(06-28-2017, 01:29 AM)GMDino Wrote: Don't like your job? Move.

Want better health care? Move.

Being slaughtered because of your political beliefs? Better hang around and rebuild your home.  Don't be bringing that stuff outside of your home country.

Displaced persons can go to the first country of safety then go back once it's safe. None of this equals coming to the west.

[StLucieBengal]

(06-28-2017, 01:51 AM)oncemoreuntothejimbreech Wrote: And just yesterday you were singing the praises of Jesus the Alpha.  I don't think that is the kind of example He set.

Jesus wouldn't be sending people across the world either.

[StLucieBengal]

(06-28-2017, 01:47 AM)oncemoreuntothejimbreech Wrote: Again, you're incorrect.  They have been killed for their religion as well as dissenting political opinions.  They are displaced if they are still inside the Syrian borders.  You read the definition.  You provided the definition.  This tap dance they don't fit the definition you provided is unbecoming.  Especially in light of the fact the UN considers them refugees under the definition you provided.  

Putting them in the west is setting them up for failure. They should have never left their continent.

[GMDino]

(06-28-2017, 09:31 AM)StLucieBengal Wrote: Jesus wouldn't be sending people across the world either.

Quote:◄ Mark 16:15 ►

Verse (Click for Chapter)

New International Version
He said to them, "Go into all the world and preach the gospel to all creation.

New Living Translation
And then he told them, "Go into all the world and preach the Good News to everyone.

English Standard Version
And he said to them, “Go into all the world and proclaim the gospel to the whole creation.

[StLucieBengal]

(06-28-2017, 01:49 AM)GMDino Wrote: Another winner of the "Golden Ticket" to the US.

Who should be staying on his continent. For his own good.

[GMDino]

(06-28-2017, 09:36 AM)StLucieBengal Wrote: Who should be staying on his continent. Because I am afraid and hate people who are different than me.

[StLucieBengal]

(06-28-2017, 09:36 AM)GMDino Wrote:

Those people weren't degenerates who needed to be cared for like children by the government. Back then if you didn't take care of yourself you died. Quite a different story today.

[GMDino]

(06-28-2017, 09:39 AM)StLucieBengal Wrote: Those people weren't degenerates who needed to be cared for like children by the government.   Back then if you didn't take care of yourself you died.   Quite a different story today.

They were people who were told to sell all their belongings and ask for the help of the people where they went.



In order to try and convert people to their religion/way of life.  They made no effort to conform to their new societies.  They wanted other countries to follow THEIR religion.