10-28-2021, 01:23 AM
(10-27-2021, 11:01 PM)NATI BENGALS Wrote: I thought he was on trial because he was an armed minor from out of state in the middle of a riot who killed people.
As far as I know he was not forced to go there. But I'm not a doctor.
It's legal for unaccompanied minors to walk around the streets in the middle of the night during riots with loaded semi auto rifles?
Yea I agree. Self defense. Just like I would be if I went out to a raucous crowd of strangers with some combat gear on and a loaded M16 and started engaging them with no authority.
He was acting as a vigilante or he wouldn't have been there. This is a common sense distinction.
It is relevant to the topic at hand. Equal justice.
.
Agreed.
I've addressed every point you continue to make and pointed out, cogently, why they are not germane to the criminal case. If you choose to dismiss them, that's fine. I'm just not going to continue reiterating why your position is not consistent with the actual case. If you'd care to actually refute any point I made I'd be happy to continue discussing the matter. Until then I think we can amicably call it a day.
