10-29-2021, 11:38 AM
(10-29-2021, 01:14 AM)Dill Wrote: "Parody" is the term you want here.
Much more like snarky, but that's my opinion.
Quote:You want to laugh at people?
People? Not at all. Arguments.
Quote:People are interested in R's crossing of a state line because they want to know what jurisdictional questions might be raised by R's actions, not "distance" questions.
No, they aren't as this has been addressed, both here and elsewhere. Anyone still bringing it up is engaging in the use of talking points to muddy the waters.
Quote:The night of the shooting, how did R get the weapon he had purchased illegally and was carrying illegally to Kenosha?
There's plenty of evidence addressing this, he got it from a friend who purchased it in Wisconsin. Now, this raises strawman purchasing concerns, but that wouldn't apply to Rittenhouse, but the person who bought it. It also has absolutely nothing to do with the crux of the case, which is the self defense argument.
Quote:I am relieved to see that I am not the only one on this thread who sees more to this case than simply question of R's guilt under current law.
Oh, so you're not discussing the subject of the thread other than as an indictment of our criminal justice system in general? That wasn't clear, at all. It's also not rather germane to the trial itself, hence my not assuming that was what you were doing. I would be happy to actually discuss the substance of the case with you, if you are so inclined.
