11-04-2021, 12:24 PM
(11-04-2021, 09:31 AM)Belsnickel Wrote: It's the DA's job to say whether they can prove charges in court. Whether they are confident that they can prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the person committed the crime and that it was not in self-defense (if we're talking homicide). Well, technically speaking it is the job of the grand jury to decide that but the 5th Amendment hasn't been fully invested, but that's another conversation again.
You say people should have to "explain it in court." That's not how our legal system works, though. The approach you're taking on this one is coming from an assumption of guilt, seemingly regardless of the evidence.
I would say there is ballistic evidence of bullets from his gun in dead bodies. As well as video evidence that shows him discharging the weapon.
How is there claims of self defense if there are no charges? I’ve seen videos of someone being arrested and the LEO telling that person to tell it to the judge or whatever.
Person is responsible for dead bodies. This is not normal. Person should be charged for making those bodies dead. Court system then does it’s part to decide the guilt or innocence for why those bodies are dead and any extenuating circumstances.
What you guys keep telling me is a DA gets to be the judge and jury when there is clear evidence a person is responsible for a dead body.
