11-11-2021, 12:07 PM
(11-11-2021, 10:44 AM)GMDino Wrote: 1) Yes, they should have refused.
2) I only listened to the case yesterday and that was in the background or on the radio to go get lunch. He sounded ok but it still too big a risk IMHO.
The court of public opinion will be different than a court of law, obviously, but I'm saying that before someone jumps in to say I think any different.
And yes, most people probably made their mind up about what kind of person he is before he testified.
I'll add there were a couple good threads about how his defenders in the public forums are shocked...just SHOCKED that prosecutors tried to make him look bad! I got a chuckle out of that.
No one is more offended by something than someone who thinks it would never happen to them (or someone they like).
I would hope that most people wouldn't be that dumb. But I do know better than to be that naïve.
"A great democracy has got to be progressive, or it will soon cease to be either great or a democracy..." - TR
"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little." - FDR
"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little." - FDR