11-11-2021, 01:29 PM
(11-11-2021, 01:04 PM)Dill Wrote: You are not "proving people wrong" when you explain how the law may let R walk if he shoots someone who grabs at the gun a friend illegally purchased for him because he thought it was cool and brought to a riot planning to "run towards danger."
You will please forgive me for not addressing points I've already addressed numerous times. We are past the point of diminishing returns with this discussion. You've made several factually inaccurate statements and you're never even attempted to address facts based arguments made in return. You have a problem with me using the term "silly"? Please let me know what adjectives I am permitted to use that won't bruise your sensibilities.
As for your argument about the law in general, maybe make a thread about that instead of clogging up an actual fact based discussion on the trial itself? I would be fascinated to see how you think the law should be changed based on this event. I'm sure none of your "fixes" would be unconstitutional at all. In any event, I've exhausted my patience in this regard and, in the interest of maintaining civility I will bid you good day.
