Kyle Rittenhouse Trial

[Dill]

(11-12-2021, 08:28 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: To quote you, LOL.  There is nothing new here.  You have provided absolutely nothing of substance in this thread.  You have ignored basic facts.  You have gotten basic facts wrong.  You have asked for proof of things you were already given at your request.  Your performance in this thread is on par with the prosecutor on the actual case, for the exact same reasons.  Your refusal to address actual facts, instead focusing on minutiae that you feel you can nitpick, is both tedious and boring.  I have taken great pains to avoid making things personal, you have not.

This is why defendants don't get to be their own jury. 

You made self defense in R's first killing the cornerstone of your argument in post #43, a defense which turns on whether he believed his life threatened. Being chased by a "large group of people" would enhance that defense. So I asked for proof of the "mob."  

Had you conceded it wasn't a mob, but Rosenbaum still reached for his weapon, etc. From there we might have moved to other issues, like how "subjective" is it really, to term bringing an illegally purchased gun to open carry through a riot riot "bad judgement." We could have revisited the "irrelevancies" you ticked off in that post, while adding new ones. 

But no. You, the "dispassionate" observer, had to double down on the "mob."  To "refute" me you provided yet another video which shows ONE person chasing R, and tried to enlist some passers by and the "warning" shooter, whose path Rittenhouse crossed at a run, 40-yards ahead. 

Now, tired of "endlessly" claiming you have not been refuted by the facts, you demote those facts to "minutiae" and the refutation of your inflated claim to "nitpicking." That is the closest I'll get to a concession.