Kyle Rittenhouse Trial

[jj22]

(11-20-2021, 03:16 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.  You're doing exactly what you accuse others of, which is seeing what you want based on your own proclivities.  I get that you don't see it, much as you didn't see it when you instantly labeled the accusations against MSNBC a "right wing conspiracy" based on nothing.  Of course it was 100% true, but that didn't stop you from instantly forming an opinion based on your personal feelings.  This is more of the same.  If you don't see that then I don't know what else to tell you.

But I've shown evidence in the pictures and videos. That's not fair to claim I and you are equal in our defenses when you can't show anything and I guess that does mean "evidence of absence", but it's not fair to equate that argument to ignore those who actually provide evidence as their own "proclivities". 

As for the msnbc court issue. I also had no problem admitting it wasn't when a poster responded to it which is why my points have always been trusted. I am an independent and can change my mind and learn something/agree with either side. You should save that speech for those who are on either side and can't show that range for willingness to change their opinoins or thier beleifs.