11-23-2021, 06:51 PM
(11-23-2021, 06:35 PM)jj22 Wrote: https://www.charlotteobserver.com/news/politics-government/article255964907.html
It's interesting to me that the headline states he said "Be armed, be dangerous", when his actual statement was "Be armed, be dangerous, be moral." Now, I know being "moral" isn't important or alter the first two statements in any way, so that's why they omitted that part from the headline. I mean, there couldn't be an alternative explanation for that omission, could there?
Please note I find the statement to be ill advised, the use of the word dangerous especially, but adding moral at the end absolutely changes the context of his statement.