Intermediate step to beginning of life uncovered

[*rfaulk34*]

(06-13-2015, 01:55 AM)Beaker Wrote: The point wasn't about whether science or religion declared the world round. The point was that science will adapt as new discoveries are made. Religious people like to claim the fact that science is tentative means its wrong. It is simply the best explanation we have at the time based on the available evidence. As new evidence becomes available, science will test its validity, then adjust its paradigm based upon the new evidence. Religious types love to try to hold that up as science is wrong. Guess what, when science is wrong, it corrects itself. When religion is wrong, it simply claims science is wrong more often and sticks with the old paradigm.

I don't believe that. I don't expect science to be omniscient and i have no issues with new ideas replacing old ones, when they're proven inaccurate. 

Seeking knowledge isn't a bad thing. Limiting the seeking because you (generally speaking) think one side disproves the other when it hasn't/can't, can and usually is, bad.

You can say one side is worse than the other but i still call it a generalization because i know plenty of people that don't think that way. Of course, it's the individual's prerogative if they want to curse the darkness instead of lighting a candle. But that's always wrong.