Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The Justices spar over the constitutionality of the death penalty
#26
(06-30-2015, 01:20 AM)Benton Wrote: But that is the biggest part of the issue. We can debate about killing anyone, but that's largely a moral debate.

The bigger issue that everyone should be able to agree on, morals aside, is that the legal system makes mistakes. It has to, it's made up of people. And we aren't perfect. LEOs, attorney, judges, juries — there's no shortage of people who can make an error in the process.

Isn't human error part of the equation ?

All the players are human, which means there will be errors, there will be some corruption, it's just part of the process and will always be ..... If your peers think you deserve death or any punishment then it's their choice. Those people have to decide, and have it on their conscience. Just as the attorney or judge has it on theirs if they let someone die.

Legal system will never be without fault. The most exreme cases need heavy punishment ..... Should it be death? Idk..... It should be very severe for those who really hurt society. Rapists, murders, child predators, human and sex trafficing, and DV abusers.





Messages In This Thread
RE: The Justices spar over the constitutionality of the death penalty - StLucieBengal - 06-30-2015, 01:29 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 17 Guest(s)