Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The Justices spar over the constitutionality of the death penalty
(06-30-2015, 02:16 PM)michaelsean Wrote: 3

(06-30-2015, 02:17 PM)michaelsean Wrote: 2009

(06-30-2015, 02:39 PM)Benton Wrote: Ok, I'll bite.

The only thing I can think of you could be referring to is Obama's inauguration. Which would have worked in terms of the beast from the sea except a- he's serving his seventh year, which is three more years than the verse states; and b- he didn't call on people to fight, that ball was already rolling. He just didn't stop it like people thought he would.

(06-30-2015, 02:47 PM)michaelsean Wrote: No it was just a random number.  I just always think it's funny if people give an answer to a question where none is expected.  Like the one above it.  But now you made me explain it, and it's no longer funny.   Tongue

(06-30-2015, 02:53 PM)bfine32 Wrote: The truly funny thing he must have accepted your answer of stoneing 3 Homosexuals.

Rolleyes

At least he's following the word.  Do you follow the word?
[Image: giphy.gif]
Your anger and ego will always reveal your true self.





Messages In This Thread
RE: The Justices spar over the constitutionality of the death penalty - GMDino - 06-30-2015, 03:24 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 21 Guest(s)