01-17-2017, 08:08 AM
(01-17-2017, 12:42 AM)impactplaya Wrote: Lance McAlister said a few weeks ago the Bengals were offered a 1st and 4th for A.J and they
turned it down
so along those thought lines a NFL front office felt A.J had all the traits of a franchise QB.
is this franchise so in love with Andy that they are afraid to see in a QB battle in training camp.that A.J
is ACTUALLY THE BETTER QB AND BE PREPARED TO ADVANCE THIS FRANCHISE past 1st rd losses ?
it looks like to me from the sample size from AJ over 2 seasons he cant do any worse than Dalton has.
I'm not a Dalton hater by any means
I just want to see the best QB on the field
I know it's apple oranges but Tom Brady replaced Drew Bledsoe years back and you know the rest of the story
seriously? ...depends how long ago it was but even if they thought we still had a superbowl run in us that would have been too good to turn down surely.
I would argue from the sample size you can also argue that that McCarron would not do markedly better...and not certainly to the point where you would need to introduce change for change sake at the position.
I think with the deal we got Andy on we're pretty lucky and are set. As long as he has the OLine fixed next year he'll be back around the 100 rating mark. That's not something I would want to give up for on an AJMc experiment
Unless you have a Rodgers, Brady, PManning who can pull it out whatever the persoonnel then every QB needs weapons around them to thrive....the most beneficial weapon of all being a good RB/game ....like Bell for Steelers, or Elliot for Cowboys
