Trump's First 100 Days

[Rotobeast]

(02-16-2017, 04:03 AM)NATI BENGALS Wrote: No and no. 

My half assed attempt at understanding the law led me to believe people receiving social security checks who were mentally incapable of handling their finances without a 3rd party were subject to this rule. If someone felt the rule unfairly hurt them they could object on a case by case basis.

I have no idea how any of this is kept track of. I had a friend who went off the rails. Couple stays in a mental hospital. He is stable to say the least. He should have some extra hoops to jump through at a minimum if he wanted to buy a gun. 

There are people i grew up with that were always in special ed classes. And they will always be dependent on a government check and they will never be able to make their own financial decisions so someone else will do it for them. They shouldnt be able to buy guns. 

Ok, cool.
Thanks for clarifying.
I thought we'd pretty much be on the same page.