Freedom of press.

[*michaelsean*]

(02-21-2017, 10:14 AM)hollodero Wrote: Well, to the latter, yeah I think it's wrong, but I think that about many things. That's not my point.
To the first question... I'm not 100% sure, that's tricky to answer. I lean towards he should be allowed; although I see it as borderline agitation. All these "enemy of the people" claims are. - My opinion probably would be, say it, but there should be a backlash in the form of harsh critizism.

There's nothing wrong with agitation.  Agitation has led to a lot of changes.  There may or may not be harsh criticism.  That's up to the people.  Like for instance, if roles were reversed and someone said the media was at war with Obama, I really wouldn't give it two seconds notice.  I mean you really don't see any Rachel Maddow or Keith Olberman threads here, because nobody on the right cares.