Trump's First 100 Days

[*bfine32*]

(02-20-2017, 05:03 PM)Dill Wrote: Strange "rationality" advocated above.

What the articles show is that Hillary and her campaign refused to go low, while Trump did not. That is not "kicking it down the road." That is called making an ethical decision.

So it wasn't racist when she did it--because she didn't do it.

You would exonerate Trump for exploiting the advantages racism provides--strengthening the existing, vicious racist animosity in the process--by claiming he was not "personally" motivated, just an opportunist. If Hispanic Cruz wasn't black then no taint of racism for questioning his origins either.

 So irrational liberals should know this: simply promoting racism doesn't make one a racist. 
 
That conclusion is in itself jaw-dropping for the ethical blindness it shares with Trump's actions.

Obviously, it's hard to "defend" against these claims of racisim because Obama is black, so folks can say he did it because Obama's black and folks really cannot say: No he didn't; as Obama is black.

Clinton supporters circulated an email questioning obama's Citizenship in 2008. This is undisputable. One then has to ask the question why/ I know how much disavowing means to you guys. Did Hillary disavow any of her supporters that curculated this email or did she remain quiet?

So we come back to the same question: Is Trump responsible if some folks bought into the birther movement because of racisim?


You guys feek free to continue with the lynch mob and personal attacks on POTUS, just because you are mad.