The scientist who enjoys debating creationists

[*bfine32*]

(08-05-2015, 10:31 AM)Beaker Wrote: First, the shroud of Turin is not a fossil.
Second, even if it were, one fossil taken alone would not constitute evidence.
Third, the sequence of the fossils record, millions of fossils spanning millions of years sequenced to show increasing complexity and diversity, certainly does serve as evidence to point to evolution as the way life proceeds.
Finally, you are still saying proof when you have been repeatedly told we are talking evidence. Are you having a hard time understanding the difference, or simply following the creationist rhetoric of using incorrect terms in an effort to confuse?

Yes, science can show how a bird became a "better bird" through fossil evidence and Natural Selection. Is there any evidence that shows a fossil transitioning from one species to modern day man?

How many fossils does it take to consitute evidence?