PnR Decorum and suspensions

[Bengalzona]

(07-11-2017, 11:15 PM)Vas Deferens Wrote: I 100% understand and agree.  My point was that when I, as a person who has been in a relationship with a "Muslim savage" will merely retort the hipocracy of someone who claims Christian values yet demonizes others AND promotes prostitution; rather than A. Reporting hateful baseless statements (I'm sure you can attest to that) or B. claiming there is inequality in the moderation (read beta whining about being reported.)

Whatever.  This whole "it's not fair" line of thinking is a bit tired when coming from posters with consistent track records of agitating just to agitate.  At some point one needs to contemplate if their actions are the problem and not others REaction to them.  I guess I'm more of a personal accountability type like that, rather than blaming my situation on other anonymous individuals I've never met.  

But again, I think the mods do a great job, even after a justified time out or two.  

Also. Frack the steelers.

Pointing out hypocrisy can be done without targeting an individual. In fact, it has been my experience that it is far more effective when you don't target a specific person in your criticism because that only causes the person to see it as a personal attack and not to consider if the proverbial "shoe fits". Things that are perceived as personal attacks are met with an equal and opposite reaction.  
  
Agitation is part of daily life here in P&R. People generally come into this forum knowing that when they express an opinion, it will probably be welcomed by some and agitate others. That is the nature of the beast. The line that we draw is when someone is seeking to agitate an individual rather than the group with an opposing view. Do you see the difference?