Target removes gender based signage for kids

[Mike M (the other one)]

(08-23-2015, 12:21 AM)Benton Wrote: Aaaaand go!

http://www.sciencemag.org/content/253/5023/1034.abstract?sid=a3ac9da2-15b4-4cd7-9a16-1f08a2fdd62f
http://www.pnas.org/content/105/27/9403.short
http://www.pnas.org/content/89/15/7199.abstract
http://www.morganclaypool.com/doi/abs/10.4199/C00064ED1V01Y201208DBR008?journalCode=dbr&
http://www.sciencemag.org/content/261/5119/321.abstract
http://www.natureworldnews.com/articles/10443/20141118/homosexuality-genetic-strongest-evidence.htm
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/23/homosexuality--choice-born-science_n_2003361.html

Could it be a learned behavior? Probably not. Mating rituals and eating habits can be, but overall what you desire eating and what you desire mating with aren't. Think about it, does a steak taste good because your dad ate steak, or because it ****ing tastes good? Ever know a guy who eats Spam and mayo sandwiches? Does he do it because EVERYBODY is doing it, or because some whacky, ****ed up gene tells him that amount of meat byproduct and egg yuck is delicious?

What you eat = genetic. You body has needs. It will speak to you in that regard. As ****ed up as they may be.

Same with the mating rituals. You being attracted to women is genetic. You buying them a drink or clubbing them over the head or ordering them online is the learned behavior.

But — and listen here, this is the important part — if your homosexuality is determined by the environment, you most likely were gay anyway. You being attracted to dudes isn't related to that slightly feminine uncle or that coach who used to give you a shoulder rub after class. It was because you were already genetically more likely to be attracted to guys. 

So when can we start testing Infants and accurately predict their sexual preference?

No matter what the studies say, they almost always refer back to stating that Social and Cultural Pressures play a bigger part in an individual's sexual lifestyle than genes does.