08-24-2015, 03:48 PM
(08-24-2015, 02:51 PM)Mike M (the other one) Wrote: yes you did post some links, and I looked at 5 of them.
They talk about the size of a person's brain and try to us that as an indicator. In a controlled test environment it might work, but as you add more and more samples to the pool, it becomes less and less accurate.
1 of them even stated that genetics has less to do with someone's sexual preference than the social and cultural side.
A diagonal crease in your ear lobe aka Frank's Sign... happens because of age. So people try to associate it with CAD, since the longer you live the greater your risks.
http://archinte.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=607639
Does that seem like a Logical conclusion to you?
Could be. As stated, I'm not a doctor.
Although I would say with the second graf, if your numbers become less accurate to a large degree , you probably aren't working off a clear question in the first place.