Mass shootings

[BengalHawk62]

(02-16-2018, 02:29 PM)PhilHos Wrote: You're missing my point. Why does need have to be a reason? There are a LOT of things we don't need that people want to use for a variety of reasons; would you recommend that THOSE things be outlawed simply because they're not needed?

Why should John Q. Citizen who's never broken the law and who would properly maintain and keep safely locked away when not inuse a military grade assault? BESIDES that he doesn't need one? What if he wants to collect one? What if he wants to shoot it at a shooting range? Why do YOU get to choose that he can't have one simply because he doesn't 'need' it?

I think you are missing my point. It’s NOT me choosing what you can and can’t have. It’s the Adam Lanza’s, the Steve Paddock, the Eric Harris and Dylan Klebolt, the Dylann Roof’s, the Nicholas Cruz’s, and on and on and on, of the country that are making these decisions for us. Yes there is a NEED to get these types of assault weapons outta the hands of these folks.

You wanna play with those types of guns, fine. Go join the military.