03-08-2018, 01:06 PM
(03-08-2018, 12:03 PM)fredtoast Wrote: No it didn't .
Yeah, it did. I've posted direct links that prove this without room for argument or debate. Simply saying, "no" does not change this fact.
Quote:The fact that both happened does not prove that one caused the other .
Sorry that you can not grasp the difference between "correlation " and "causation".
Nope, too stupid. I wish I was as smart as a lawyer who doesn't know the law, but alas.
(03-08-2018, 12:09 PM)fredtoast Wrote: You completely missed my point. Let me make it more simple for you.
.08 dui = gun registration
.06 dui = gun confiscation
Only if the two circumstances were directly parallel, which they are not.
Quote:The fact that they were successful with the reasonable .08 did not create any "political momentum " to get a .06 dui.
Again, you unwittingly prove my point for me. They advocated for .08, got it and went for more. The fact that they were unsuccessful, in this instance, is indicative of the fact that .06, as I already stated, and you oddly ignored, is that such a low bar for DUI puts anyone who had wine with dinner at risk of having their lives ruined. Again, you find the analogy clever, it is not as it is not a direct comparison, nor is it close to being one.
Quote:Understand now?
Understanding was never an issue, agreement is the issue at hand.
(03-08-2018, 12:17 PM)fredtoast Wrote: None of the regulations in place would stop any violent criminal from buying a ar-15 as long as private sales are not regulated.
Is that what happened? I'll save you the trouble of not answering. No.
Quote:Very disingenuous to claim that more regulation is not needed or that criminal record will stop anyone from buying any weapon they want from a private seller.
Very disingenuous to claim private sales are the problem when the firearms acquired in these shootings were not acquired in that fashion. Tsk tsk, Fred.
