The new symbol of hate

[*bfine32*]

(02-28-2019, 04:45 PM)GMDino Wrote: Dude made a post that the way to raise real (straight) men was to go back to the good old days when fathers took their sons to brothels so they learned that sex was between a man and a woman.

Someone asked if he could take his daughters there too. (That post/thread is deleted)

StL decided that meant the guy wanted to "do his daughters" and wouldn't let it go.  THAT'S why it mentioned more than once.  Because HE kept trying to make it stick when it was never said.

On topic: The "hat" is a hat.  If the people who wear it think it means more than an advertisement for Trump and his campaign that's on them.  Some people like to attribute a lot of "meaning" to inanimate objects and then get pissy when someone else doesn't feel just as strongly as they do.

On the other side if a lot of people wearing the same piece of clothing do a lot of stupid things ("Mexico will pay for the wall!" "Lock her up!" "In the old days you could rough a guy up!") then sooner rather than later the one piece of clothing will get a bad rep.  Fair?  Nope.  Just part of life.  

Personally?  I don't think people wearing MAGA gear are necessarily racist.  But then I tend to judge people on the actions and words not their appearance.  I do think they've been hoodwink but a Class B conman but that's a different discussion.

Seems I remember the deleted post asked could the poster take Lucie's daughters to the brothel.

Whatever was said Lucie took offense and got suspended simply because someone brought his daughters into a conversation.

Was the suspension warranted; not for me to say, but let's not dance on a dead man's grave and pretend it was simply Lucie over-reacting.  

But enough about Lucie