Transexual threatens to send a fellow show guest home in an ambulance

[StLucieBengal]

(07-23-2015, 09:50 AM)GMDino Wrote: To be fair Fred was just going to provide a service that Lucy said we had to have to make sure the girls don't turn gay.

Although I'm also not sure Lucy cares if women are gay as the only examples he ever uses or talks about is "dudes".

Please post where I was advocating for grown men to sexually groom little girls. Or even little boys.

[GMDino]

(07-23-2015, 02:05 PM)StLucieBengal Wrote: Please post where I was advocating for grown men to sexually groom little girls. Or even little boys.

(07-19-2015, 11:52 PM)StLucieBengal Wrote: Of all who are not gay.  When have you been presented with the option of being gay?  

Your all claiming your straight when none of us had been given the opportunity to even be gay.    So your choice was a single choice of women.   You don't get another choice unless you strike out with women repeatedly.   Or unless another gay moves in to groom.    

Puberty aged children are very impressionable and with hormones raging ... If they can't close the deal with a woman they will move to the next option.   A dude.    Who they become emptionally connected.    

Now they also think they didn't make a choice because they never had closed the deal with a girl and made a romantic emotional connections.   During these time when hormones are raging is where we get imprinted.     So both sides see it as never making a choice but in fact the choice is there it's just made during puberty as we are changing.  

Once again i go back to old days where fathers took their sons to the brothel.   It's not only was a right of passage but also a guide to putting them on track to have a family.

[RICHMONDBENGAL_07]

(07-19-2015, 11:52 PM)StLucieBengal Wrote: Of all who are not gay.  When have you been presented with the option of being gay?  

Your all claiming your straight when none of us had been given the opportunity to even be gay.    So your choice was a single choice of women.   You don't get another choice unless you strike out with women repeatedly.   Or unless another gay moves in to groom.    

Puberty aged children are very impressionable and with hormones raging ... If they can't close the deal with a woman they will move to the next option.   A dude.    Who they become emptionally connected.    

Now they also think they didn't make a choice because they never had closed the deal with a girl and made a romantic emotional connections.   During these time when hormones are raging is where we get imprinted.     So both sides see it as never making a choice but in fact the choice is there it's just made during puberty as we are changing.  

Once again i go back to old days where fathers took their sons to the brothel.   It's not only was a right of passage but also a guide to putting them on track to have a family.

(07-23-2015, 02:05 PM)StLucieBengal Wrote: Please post where I was advocating for grown men to sexually groom little girls.   Or even little boys.

Without a doubt one of the most ridiculous arguments you've put forth.  People aren't arguing with you or debating with you on this.  They're mocking you.

[StLucieBengal]

(07-23-2015, 02:16 PM)RICHMONDBENGAL_07 Wrote: Without a doubt one of the most ridiculous arguments you've put forth.  People aren't arguing with you or debating with you on this.  They're mocking you.

Going back in history to show how cultures have made an emotional connection with young men and women? Hate to tell you this but informing you of history is not advocating its practice. It's showing a history of such action taking place and reinforcing the emotional connection between the two sexes.

But please, by all means, continue to misrepresent what I said...

[RICHMONDBENGAL_07]

(07-23-2015, 02:38 PM)StLucieBengal Wrote: Going back in history to show how cultures have made an emotional connection with young men and women?  Hate to tell you this but informing you of history is not advocating its practice.   It's showing a history of such action taking place and reinforcing the emotional connection between the two sexes.  

But please,  by all means, continue to misrepresent what I said...

No please continue to defend your ridiculous argument...

[Mike M (the other one)]

(07-23-2015, 02:38 PM)StLucieBengal Wrote: Going back in history to show how cultures have made an emotional connection with young men and women?  Hate to tell you this but informing you of history is not advocating its practice.   It's showing a history of such action taking place and reinforcing the emotional connection between the two sexes.  

But please,  by all means, continue to misrepresent what I said...

and in history, women were married off at the age of 13-14ish (basically as soon as they start in on puberty), not sent to a clinic like Fred's to keep them on the straight and narrow until they are older.

People you don't have to like what he said, but we're not doing that anymore and you all know it, and you also know what he's talking about. It was a very common practice, even in American culture. I don't know why you're making such a big deal about it.

It's not even the real issue that we are trying to discuss. He has a point about emotional connections being made/not made, that's one of the several theories involved. Attack that theory instead of the useless bs that you are attacking, it makes you all look petty.

[fredtoast]

(07-23-2015, 06:21 PM)Mike M (the other one) Wrote: People you don't have to like what he said, but we're not doing that anymore and you all know it, and you also know what he's talking about. It was a very common practice, even in American culture. I don't know why you're making such a big deal about it.

Uh, actually, no.  It wasn't a common practice at all.

[GMDino]

(07-23-2015, 06:21 PM)Mike M (the other one) Wrote: and in history, women were married off at the age of 13-14ish (basically as soon as they start in on puberty), not sent to a clinic like Fred's to keep them on the straight and narrow until they are older.

People you don't have to like what he said, but we're not doing that anymore and you all know it, and you also know what he's talking about. It was a very common practice, even in American culture. I don't know why you're making such a big deal about it.

It's not even the real issue that we are trying to discuss. He has a point about emotional connections being made/not made, that's one of the several theories involved. Attack that theory instead of the useless bs that you are attacking, it makes you all look petty.

He's not talking about arranged marriages or the old guy down the street who married his friend's daughter.

He said fathers took their sons to prostitutes so they could "connect" with a female and put them on track to have a family.

if you can't see a bunch of things wrong with that I can't help you.

[StLucieBengal]

(07-23-2015, 09:25 PM)GMDino Wrote: He's not talking about arranged marriages or the old guy down the street who married his friend's daughter.

He said fathers took their sons to prostitutes so they could "connect" with a female and put them on track to have a family.

if you can't see a bunch of things wrong with that I can't help you.

A post from a reddit user about what her husband did...  

Quote:A few days ago, my husband of 22 years, took my 17 yr old son to a "happy ending" massage parlor. I live in the U.S.A. Texas, so prostitution isnt legal here. In fact, it is VERY illegal. My husband did in fact lie about where he and my son were going. The only reason I ever found out is because my son told me. He said he would feel guilty lying to my face about something this important. He is 17, but to my knowledge he isnt/wasnt sexually active yet. He said this experience was really awkward, and he didnt know if he would like it or not. The girl, was very nice, and really pretty. he said he was fine with the whole thing. Sex wasnt as frightening as he thought it would be. He said that he knows its illegal, and that he cant go to places like that all the time. He just wishes that he could have met her in real life.
My husband. At 1st he tried to explain why what he did wasnt exactly wrong. and how he knows that lying to me wasnt the right thing to do, but he knew that i would not approve, so "its better to beg for forgiveness than to ask for permission."He also tried the whole, I dont understand this part of his culture thing.(hes Korean)this didnt make things any better. I wouldnt leave him for this, but he knows he is an asshole for lying to me, or for thinking that he knows better, than i know for our son.
I knew that my Husbands father took him to a brothel when he was young, that was different though, they lived in Korea, and it was a different time. I never imagined that he would have the same thing planned for our son.

These things are culturally relevant and have been for hundreds of years.   This post was made 25 days ago.

[CKwi88]

Puberty aged kids that are high impressionable have their (maybe) first sexual experience with a woman paid monetarily to please them.

Sounds like a psychologist's wet dream, not to mention the misogyny of the matter.

[StLucieBengal]

(07-24-2015, 01:09 AM)CKwi88 Wrote: Puberty aged kids that are high impressionable have their (maybe) first sexual experience with a woman paid monetarily to please them.

Sounds like a psychologist's wet dream, not to mention the misogyny of the matter.

This is exactly why it's important who they connect with emotionally at that age.

[GMDino]

(07-23-2015, 10:58 PM)StLucieBengal Wrote: A post from a Reddit user about what her husband did...  


These things are culturally relevant and have been for hundreds of years.   This post was made 25 days ago.

So first you try to defend it by saying it happened in the far past...now you post something from Reddit to show it still goes on?

Besides that you are COMPLETELY missing the point that that is not how prepare a boy to "take on a family" by getting him a HJ at a massage parlor.

Cripes I hope your wife is as smart as you say she is so she can handle the kids while you're looking for a male escort to "emotionally connect" with them when they hit puberty.  :snark:

[Johnny Cupcakes]

Taking your minor son to a brothel to straighten him out is all good, but having your son have a committed relationship with someone he loves that happens to be another guy is a no-no.

Something is wrong with this line of thinking.

[CKwi88]

(07-24-2015, 04:26 AM)StLucieBengal Wrote: This is exactly why it's important who they connect with emotionally at that age.

And having someone paid to please you is a desireable emotional connection at that age?

[*Nately120*]

(07-24-2015, 11:52 AM)CKwi88 Wrote: And having someone paid to please you is a desireable emotional connection at that age?

I know when my ol' man paid some dirty slut 15 years my senior to tug on my wee wee the first thing that came to mind was "Holy crap, I want to raise a family!"

[Rotobeast]

(07-24-2015, 11:52 AM)CKwi88 Wrote: And having someone paid to please you is a desireable emotional connection at that age?

That was usually the problem with that practice....
A young boy would fall in love with a prostitute.

FWIW... it WAS a somewhat common practice (in my area, at least), but died off in the late 60's with the sexual revolution.
Women started to become comfortable with their sexuality and stopped waiting for marriage, to become sexually active.
My father always joked about taking me to a brothel, but never did because I had girls coming over to the house when I was 14/15.

I'm not saying that whole brothel thing was a good (I wouldn't have complained), but it was a thing.

[*Nately120*]

(07-24-2015, 12:52 PM)Rotobeast Wrote: That was usually the problem with that practice....
A young boy would fall in love with a prostitute.

FWIW... it WAS a somewhat common practice (in my area, at least), but died off in the late 60's with the sexual revolution.
Women started to become comfortable with their sexuality and stopped waiting for marriage, to become sexually active.
My father always joked about taking me to a brothel, but never did because I had girls coming over to the house when I was 14/15.

I'm not saying that whole brothel thing was a good (I wouldn't have complained), but it was a thing.

Ah the good old days!  Throw your teenage son at a hooker for his own good and lock up your daughters lest they become those shameful hookers that other fathers use to show their teenage sons the value of heterosexuality. Also funny is that a certain someone in these parts who thinks paying a woman to engage in sexual activity with your son is male bonding also complains about Muslims treating women like objects. Hmm...

[StLucieBengal]

(07-24-2015, 01:00 PM)Nately120 Wrote: Ah the good old days!  Throw your teenage son at a hooker for his own good and lock up your daughters lest they become those shameful hookers that other fathers use to show their teenage sons the value of heterosexuality.  Also funny is that a certain someone in these parts who thinks paying a woman to engage in sexual activity with your son is male bonding also complains about Muslims treating women like objects.  Hmm...

Who advocated for taking their kids to see prostitutes? I have only said it was a common practice back in the day. You all have ran with it like I said it was a treatment against being gay. Connecting my point of an emotional connection throughout the history of man is nothing close to what your all running with.... Which means none of you have any legitimate response.

[RICHMONDBENGAL_07]

(07-24-2015, 04:47 PM)StLucieBengal Wrote: Who advocated for taking their kids to see prostitutes?  I have only said it was a common practice back in the day.  You all have ran with it like I said it was a treatment against being gay.    Connecting my point of an emotional connection throughout the history of man is nothing close to what your all running with....   Which means none of you have any legitimate response.

You're still hardcore defending this brothel stuff.

[GMDino]

(07-24-2015, 04:47 PM)StLucieBengal Wrote: Who advocated for taking their kids to see prostitutes? I have only said it was a common practice back in the day. You all have ran with it like I said it was a treatment against being gay. Connecting my point of an emotional connection throughout the history of man is nothing close to what your all running with.... Which means none of you have any legitimate response.

(07-19-2015, 11:52 PM)StLucieBengal Wrote: Of all who are not gay.  When have you been presented with the option of being gay?  

Your all claiming your straight when none of us had been given the opportunity to even be gay.    So your choice was a single choice of women.   You don't get another choice unless you strike out with women repeatedly.   Or unless another gay moves in to groom.    

Puberty aged children are very impressionable and with hormones raging ... If they can't close the deal with a woman they will move to the next option.   A dude.    Who they become emptionally connected.    

Now they also think they didn't make a choice because they never had closed the deal with a girl and made a romantic emotional connections.   During these time when hormones are raging is where we get imprinted.     So both sides see it as never making a choice but in fact the choice is there it's just made during puberty as we are changing.  

Once again i go back to old days where fathers took their sons to the brothel.   It's not only was a right of passage but also a guide to putting them on track to have a family.

(07-20-2015, 03:20 AM)StLucieBengal Wrote: That's it's been a rite of passage passed on from father to son in many cultures for ages.    I was pointing that out and comparing it to my suggestion that forming an emotional bond with a the opposite sex is what makes you straight.   And only when you fail to make that bond is when you choose to be gay.    It's a choice but not a choice only because ita your responsibility to form that bond.    

Hornones at puberty affect our heads in many ways.    I think this is one of them.  


The connection to taking your sons to a brothel was only referring how that bond has been made in older times.