Trump's ethanol waivers are sparking rebellion in farm country

[Dill]

(08-28-2019, 12:16 AM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: No, your criticism of the current China policy is exactly what China wants.  That's you, I hope inadvertently, supporting China.

LOL so YOU know what China wants. 

Yes, the "weakness" of democracy is that voters can be fickle, and voters determine leaders and influence policy. Very different from authoritarian countries like China. But some think that "weakness" is part of the reason democracies are generally better places to live, and "strength" is why authoritarian systems are generally not.

No doubt Chinese leaders would like democratic "weakness" to work in their favor, so US voters will contest Trump's trade policies. That's good for China. At the moment.

So I agree with you that Xi et al. would like to see more of these Dino types out there questioning their own government and "doing what China wants." 

And Trump doesn't want to see more voters like Dino. That's for sure.  Enough traitors in Congress who hate America. Same party as Dino, too. SIDING WITH THE ENEMY.

Safe to say that YOU aren't "for China," right?  Anyone else on this thread FOR CHINA instead of the US?

(08-28-2019, 12:16 AM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: No, Dill's muslim bias is based on his obvious muslim bias.  He mitigates muslim extremism while enhancing Israeli "atrocities"
Oddly, no.  Just you and Dill.  There was another, but enough said.

Not quite enough said.  You've had a deal of difficulty specifying dill's Muslim bias, while continuing to call it "obvious." 
That's ok if "truthiness" is your standard, but you ought to acknowledge that is your standard.

Looks like the choice here is between ignoring Israeli atrocities or "enhancing" them by mere factual recall, which no doubt "mitigates" the extremism of Muslims defending their homes.  Unbiased friend of Israel or "Muslim bias"?  Simple choices. Black and white.

Strength vs Weakness. Israel or Muslim "extremists"? China or the US? Friends vs enemies/animals. "Obvious" biases.

As neutral analytic options disappear, truthiness saturates the whole.