Mass shootings

[*bfine32*]

(02-16-2018, 02:29 PM)PhilHos Wrote: You're missing my point. Why does need have to be a reason? There are a LOT of things we don't need that people want to use for a variety of reasons; would you recommend that THOSE things be outlawed simply because they're not needed?

Why should John Q. Citizen who's never broken the law and who would properly maintain and keep safely locked away when not inuse a military grade assault? BESIDES that he doesn't need one? What if he wants to collect one? What if he wants to shoot it at a shooting range? Why do YOU get to choose that he can't have one simply because he doesn't 'need' it?

I've used the correlation of a high-performance automobile. They are designed to do nothing more than break the law and can often lead to death. Why are they not outlawed and hell driving's not even protected under the Constitution.