PFF OL grades through week 4

[Isaac Curtis: The Real #85]

(10-05-2020, 08:46 PM)ezekiel23 Wrote: Agree.It’s really red flag as just how accurate their ratings on individual players are,considering they have an overwhelming amount of data to go through every week.It’s just not feasible.I personally wouldn’t put a lot is stock in it.

Gotta say I disagree. I mean, sure, there can be quibbles with individual guys, but writ large, and relative to each other, I think those grades correspond to what my eyes have seen. Examples:

1) Bates has been lights out
2) Burrow has been good
3) Boyd is our best receiver.
4) Ross is our worst receiver
5) Green has struggled
6) DEs have been poor, Lawson best in show.
7) The CBs are decent but not phenomenal.
8) Williams is our best OL.
9) Price & Johnson are awful.
10) The DTs & LBs have been mediocre (at best), but Reader is the best of the bunch.

The ratings concur. I'd call that pretty good. I mean, if they had Dunlap, Hubbard, Price, Ross, or Pratt rated highly, or Bates, Burrow, and Boys low, THAT would be a joke.

I mean, who do you think is out of line?