10-31-2021, 05:52 PM
(10-30-2021, 10:24 PM)Dill Wrote: And that is why the majority of respondents to this thread are surprised that a 17-year-old can carry a weapon from his state into another, following a report of riots, and then hear that the muddled actions in the videos we see can be interpreted to clearly show "self defense," once factors placing an armed underage perp in a riot are determined to be legally irrelevant.
This is a demonstrably false statement based on evidence already presented in this thread. I don't think a logical, impartial, person perusing this thread could say you're arguing from a good faith perspective here. Again, for a person who claims to cherish a logic and fact based argument your conduct in this thread contains a complete, an suspicious, dearth of both. Of course, I could be wrong, in which case you'll counter with a logical, fact based post showing this.
Also, I am again compelled to point out your complete lack of condemnation for the people who actually initiated this violent encounter. Unless you consider them children or otherwise intellectually incapacitated to the point that they are unable to prevent themselves from attacking another human simply because they don't share their politics or positions. Is that the reason?
