Kyle Rittenhouse Trial

[Dill]

(11-11-2021, 01:29 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: You will please forgive me for not addressing points I've already addressed numerous times.  We are past the point of diminishing returns with this discussion.  You've made several factually inaccurate statements and you're never even attempted to address facts based arguments made in return.  You have a problem with me using the term "silly"?*  Please let me know what adjectives I am permitted to use that won't bruise your sensibilities.

As for your argument about the law in general, maybe make a thread about that instead of clogging up an actual fact based discussion on the trial itself?  I would be fascinated to see how you think the law should be changed based on this event.  I'm sure none of your "fixes" would be unconstitutional at all.  In any event, I've exhausted my patience in this regard and, in the interest of maintaining civility I will bid you good day.

?? Posting yet another link to a video showing only Rosenbaum chasing Rittenhouse is EXACTLY addressing a "fact-based argument made in return." The "diminishing return" you avoid here is admission your "mob" was one person, that your description was inflated by that partisan vision you claim others exhibit.    

What you call "addressing points you've already addressed" is just more of your refereeing your own case, declaring points settled which aren't and imposing thematic limits on jj's thread. People still interested in this thread are free to consider Rittenhouse trial from a narrow legal angle focusing on how law and evidence come together, but they are just as free to place evidence, law and events of the trial in a larger social-historical context. If they are not satisfied that topics declared closed are really closed, they are free to continue addressing them.


*I wouldn't have mentioned "silly," but it was your bruised sensibility which complained of "petty insults"--after your not-so-petty accusations of bad faith and deliberate falsehood. Why not avoid all the ad hominem altogether?