Kyle Rittenhouse Trial

[*jason*]

(11-16-2021, 08:57 PM)Dill Wrote: That's sort of how I feel sometimes, though I am on the other side of the issue.

Still, since law and security are at stake, I continue to make the effort. 

I have to say though, I am not sure what the "convincing" was supposed to be about in this case.

I think most people on this thread assumed Rittenhouse would get off. We all remember the Zimmerman case.

The division was between those think that bad and those who think it good. 

"Proving" that R's actions meet the current bar for self defense is probably not an effective way to convince people that the law is just in this case. 

This is just like George Zimmerman except this time a group of Martins chased him down, and physically attacked him.... Oh and this is caught on video. Believe me; I don't like people like this kid. Open carrying to "protect private property" is goofy as hell. He's a dumb kid that should've been home doin' dumb kid things. The people he killed should've been doing more productive things like not engaging in a riot, assaulting kids, and God knows what else. Again... I don't like people that are like what Rittenhouse seems to be, but he wasn't breaking the law, and was trying to remove himself from the situation. It's really that simple.