The Bengals are alleging a conflict of interest from the county's non legal representative, David Abrams because he is also representing the Cleveland Browns.
And and it was Hamilton County who was alleging lack of communication from its own legal representative

(Yesterday, 03:16 PM)J24 Wrote: https://local12.com/news/local/hamilton-county-fires-law-firm-final-stretch-bengals-lease-negotiations-cincinnati-frost-brown-todd-dinsmore-shohl-connie-pillich-nfl-football-team-deal-lawyers-attorneys

Once again the Bengals are being accused of poor communication in a contract deal. We're dealing multiple dumbasses in this situation with both organization and county.

I did not realize, this is the law firm I use for my businesses. Should I be concerned?

I guess I am confused as I thought they had an agreement, but now maybe not??

(Yesterday, 06:53 PM)Luvnit2 Wrote: I did not realize, this is the law firm I use for my businesses. Should I be concerned?

I guess I am confused as I thought they had an agreement, but now maybe not??

they have an agreement on phase of the stadium renovation...what they don't have is a new lease

(Yesterday, 06:56 PM)pally Wrote: they have an agreement on phase of the stadium renovation...what they don't have is a new lease

TY

It makes no sense for the Bengals to rennoavate without a new lease agreement. It does make sense they needed the costs to know if they want to sign a new lease.

I would think they all believe they are going to work this out for the long term otherwise why would they be pushing to try to host the draft in ‘28 or ‘29?

(Yesterday, 07:25 PM)Luvnit2 Wrote: TY

It makes no sense for the Bengals to rennoavate without a new lease agreement. It does make sense they needed the costs to know if they want to sign a new lease.

The timing for phase 1 approval was in part due to the availability of loan money from an NFL program. These improvements won't actually be fully implemented until the next off-season