![]() |
Why I Do Not Want Mixon - Printable Version +- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (https://thebengalsboard.com) +-- Forum: Cincinnati Bengals / NFL (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-3.html) +--- Forum: Draft Central (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-9.html) +--- Thread: Why I Do Not Want Mixon (/thread-10674.html) |
RE: Why I Do Not Want Mixon - YsCascadia - 04-06-2017 (04-06-2017, 04:19 PM)ochocincos Wrote: And that's the problem. Molitor (or anyone else) does not have "every right" to hit Mixon (or anyone else) for any reason unless it was clearly self defense. Based on the video, she put her hands on him first and it wasn't based on self defense. He was walking away and she said something to him then shoved him. What the problem is, is supposed men like you thinking that a person doesn't have the right to get physical if the person is "only using words". He was being a nuisance from the beginning, she has every right to escalate as the situation dictated. How far does Mixon have to follow Molitor before you would consider his actions threatening? What does he have to say? He wasn't walking away. That is the most ******** thing I have heard. RE: Why I Do Not Want Mixon - YsCascadia - 04-06-2017 (04-06-2017, 04:16 PM)ochocincos Wrote: All this discussion has forced me to yet again go back and review the released video. You forgot to add "calmly" to 8 as if he didn't have a care in the world. You need to get your eyes checked as Molitor doesn't "invite" Mixon to the table. Molitor doesn't NEED to try to make a run for the door. That FACT is that she was in the cafe booth that has 1 exit that Mixon was standing at. Get those eyes check man. You sound like a fanboy to me. Mixon is at fault. Period. You can justify and rationalize all you want. Hell, since you want Mixon so bad, why not shill for Ray Rice. At least we know he can play in the NFL. RE: Why I Do Not Want Mixon - YsCascadia - 04-06-2017 (04-06-2017, 05:10 PM)ochocincos Wrote: What proof do you have that Mixon admitted his interaction with Molitor started well before what happened in the cafe? He reported that their argument started outside the cafe, meaning directly outside. That doesn't mean it happened at another establishment. There is no proof that they met at another establishment, that he asked her out and she declined. http://www.oudaily.com/sports/oklahoma-football-amelia-molitor-told-police-joe-mixon-punched-her/article_b57a9caa-ef10-11e6-9ec1-077fb3173bac.html Big Boss already provided a video. I haven't seen this video. I have only read online reports. Notice I haven't been on this board long and just found it. Mixon doesn't have the right to feel threatened due to him making sexual advances toward her and then harassing her and her friends as well as him following her. You question is an appeal to stone. You make it sound like Molitor just walked up and shoved Mixon for no reason. Didn't happen that way. If a woman shoves me for no reason, then yes, I *could* view her as a threat. However being a man, I wouldn't worry to much about a shove from woman that looks to be a foot shorter than Molitor is from Mixon. I know that if I wanted to, I could do serious harm to her and I would only use the necessary amount of force to subdue her, could be a punch, but not a full force blow. RE: Why I Do Not Want Mixon - ochocincos - 04-06-2017 (04-06-2017, 09:52 PM)YsCascadia Wrote: What the problem is, is supposed men like you thinking that a person doesn't have the right to get physical if the person is "only using words". He was being a nuisance from the beginning, she has every right to escalate as the situation dictated. Men like me? You don't know what kind of man I am, so shut your mouth. I am a man that doesn't believe in violence unless it is purely based on self defense. I am a man that believes both men and women should be held responsible for putting their hands on someone else. Gender does not matter. Everyone is equal. You think a person has the right to get physical with someone else if that person is saying mean things to them? In today's society, people often say any mean thing to they want to others because there are no legal repercussions. And if you strike someone because they called you a name, you will be the one with the assault charge and going to jail, and the person who said something mean to you will not receive any punishment. In fact, in another thread titled "Mixon Visiting Cincy", I said.... ochocincos Wrote:Imagine if people were actually able to get into legal trouble for offensive and mean things they said. Maybe people wouldn't be so quick to say things like that if they had to worry about repercussions and less incidents like this would happen.http://thebengalsboard.com/Thread-Mixon-Visiting-Cincy?pid=365768#pid365768 Therefore, I am saying that I'm with you in that people should NOT be able to get away with saying any vile thing they want. The difference is you are saying you support using physical violence when someone says something offensive or mean whereas I am saying there should be legal action. You quoted my words in the other thread and followed up with... YsCascadia Wrote:You mean like.... "F*** you white b*** and you little Fa^^^^ friend here?" You made the assumption that I was saying Molitor should have been the one to keep her mouth shut, but I said no such thing. My point was that if people were able to get into legal trouble over verbal abuse, Mixon and/or Molitor could have gotten in trouble prior to any physical altercation going down. If people had to worry about the things they said to each other, there's a decent chance fewer physical altercations would actually happen. Also, what PROOF do you have that Mixon said "F*** you white b*** and you little Fa^^^^ friend here?" to Molitor? It's pure speculation and assumption on your part. And why is it that you believe what Molitor said but you don't believe what Mixon said when he stated in an interview that Molitor and her friends said racial comments to him? Why couldn't it be that both said mean and vile things to each other? And why do you think it's ok for a woman to hit a man who says mean things? Is it because you think women are weaker than men and therefore that makes it ok? What if Molitor was a man of the same height and weight as her and then proceeded to do the exact same thing to Mixon? Should it then be ok for Mixon to hit him because he's a man? Should it be ok for the man to hit Mixon? You keep saying things like Mixon hit on Molitor, said vile things to her, prevented her from leaving the cafe, etc. There is no PROOF of that. And any time I or anyone else in these threads ask you to provide proof, you simply ignore it. Now, if there is proof of what was actually said, it's not easily found and you should provide a link to what was said to support your argument. Because honestly, I think that you have put an emotional attachment on this incident and look at things so black and white that, in your mind, there's no possible way that Molitor could have said any mean or offensive things to Mixon but he said all these mean and offensive things to her. The reality is this is a grey area where both parties are at fault, both had a chance to walk away, and both had a hand in how things escalated. In my opinion and in today's legal system, it does not matter whether you are a man or woman. You do not have any right to cause physical harm to someone else unless it is purely in self defense. Period. RE: Why I Do Not Want Mixon - ochocincos - 04-06-2017 (04-06-2017, 10:09 PM)YsCascadia Wrote: http://www.oudaily.com/sports/oklahoma-football-amelia-molitor-told-police-joe-mixon-punched-her/article_b57a9caa-ef10-11e6-9ec1-077fb3173bac.html You provided a link that clearly says "Amelia Molitor TOLD POLICE Joe Mixon punched her after she denied sexual advances." Just because this was stated by her does not make it true. Just like Mixon saying Molitor used racial slurs doesn't make it true. People lie all the time. Unless there's recorded evidence of the audio and multiple witnesses to what was said, it becomes "he said, she said". How do you know why Molitor shoved Mixon? How do you know what was said? According to https://oklahoma.rivals.com/news/mixon-charged-with-misdemeanor-offense-in-alleged-assault, Mixon was listed at 6'2" 210 lbs, and Molitor was listed at 5'6" 130 lbs. Just because YOU wouldn't worry too much about a shove from a woman of that size doesn't mean Mixon (or anyone else) wouldn't or shouldn't. How do you know you would "only use the necessary amount of force" to subdue her? What is considered "necessary" is subjective. |