Posts: 2,073
Threads: 11
Reputation:
11503
Joined: Apr 2020
(Yesterday, 06:36 PM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: It's nice to rewrite history, but the Browns so vastly overpaid Zeitler that they traded him 2 years later and the team that traded for him cut him 2 years after that rather than pay him the end of the contract. Until last year (playing between an All-Pro and a Second Team All-Pro) he had never been as good as he was here, and that was only just pretty good not even very good, let alone great.
Zeitler was an above average player who became the highest paid guard in all of football. I will never feel bad about not signing him to that deal.
I agree. Zeitler wasnt worth the contract the Browns gave him. Zeitler is the BJ Hill equivalent of an offensive lineman. A good, above average lineman but not great and certainly never elite.
1
Posts: 37,232
Threads: 49
Reputation:
242567
Joined: May 2015
Location: Star Valley, Wyoming
(Yesterday, 06:45 PM)George Cantstandya Wrote: It doesn't really affect a trade. The non-exclusive trade affects teams wanting to sign him because teams can still make him an offer once free agency starts. If he accepts the other team's offer and Bengals refuse to match it the teams gives up 2 first round picks. Now that he is tagged they can trade him and any compensation from the team that accepts the trade gives up whatever they are willing to trade for him.
Well, I don't think any team will give him an offer if it would cost them 2 first round picks is what I am saying...
1
Posts: 3,747
Threads: 96
Reputation:
43650
Joined: Aug 2017
(Yesterday, 06:47 PM)Nate (formerly eliminate08) Wrote: Well, I don't think any team will give him an offer if it would cost them 2 first round picks is what I am saying...
Sorry must of misunderstood you. Yes I don't think any team is going to make him an offer and give up 2 firsts if the Bengals don't match. But that doesn't make him unable to be traded. He can still be traded to a team for whatever. Examples 2nd round pick plus a player, or a 1st pick, or a 3rd round pick plus a year of Skyline Chili for the team cafeteria, etc..
1
Posts: 2,914
Threads: 41
Reputation:
10300
Joined: May 2015
If the bengals hit on some draft picks since Chase and Tee there would be an argument not to sign both of them.
But they haven’t. There aren’t any young players up for contracts soon that have anywhere close to Tee’s value.
Posts: 37,232
Threads: 49
Reputation:
242567
Joined: May 2015
Location: Star Valley, Wyoming
(Yesterday, 06:54 PM)George Cantstandya Wrote: Sorry must of misunderstood you. Yes I don't think any team is going to make him an offer and give up 2 firsts if the Bengals don't match. But that doesn't make him unable to be traded. He can still be traded to a team for whatever. Examples 2nd round pick plus a player, or a 1st pick, or a 3rd round pick plus a year of Skyline Chili for the team cafeteria, etc.. 
Okay, guess that is an out so he can be traded, thanks George.
Actually liked TLL's trade thought in Brad's Mayer thread.
Posts: 3,747
Threads: 96
Reputation:
43650
Joined: Aug 2017
(Yesterday, 06:59 PM)Nate (formerly eliminate08) Wrote: Okay, guess that is an out so he can be traded, thanks George. 
Actually liked TLL's trade thought in Brad's Mayer thread.
Yeah sorry I realized I made a typo in my first reply to you and posted non-exclusive "trade" instead of "tag". Edited that earlier post. Sorry for the confusion.
Posts: 3,406
Threads: 105
Reputation:
19155
Joined: May 2015
(Yesterday, 12:52 PM)Frank Booth Wrote: Tee Higgins isnt on the same level as AJ Green and the rest of the NFL knows that
hand over the weed
If Higgins saw 130+ targets, he would be on pace, or more likely shatter green.
No season where green had under 130 targets, yet still more targets than tee, was he any more productive.
Both really good WRs
Posts: 28,701
Threads: 358
Reputation:
250572
Joined: Aug 2016
(6 hours ago)Bengalbug Wrote: If Higgins saw 130+ targets, he would be on pace, or more likely shatter green.
No season where green had under 130 targets, yet still more targets than tee, was he any more productive.
Both really good WRs
And if AJ had Burrow at QB instead of Dalton he would have had multiple 1st team All Pro’s. See, we can all throw out “if's.”
AJ>>>Tee
Posts: 3,406
Threads: 105
Reputation:
19155
Joined: May 2015
(3 hours ago)Nicomo Cosca Wrote: And if AJ had Burrow at QB instead of Dalton he would have had multiple 1st team All Pro’s. See, we can all throw out “if's.”
AJ>>>Tee
The qb bump is rarely true, and it’s not as if dalton was horrible. WRs with much worse QBs, go play with better QBs and the difference in statistics is marginal if any.
|