Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Dallas PFF Scores
#61
(12-12-2024, 11:20 AM)Whatever Wrote: You can't, so far as I'm aware.

Yeah, that's why I don't use that simulator. Having a full life and demanding job, I just don't have the time to learn and research the entire draft prospect field. The other simulators at least offer a bio, overview, and sometimes a meager scouting report. That way when I get to the names that I'm unfamiliar with, I can at least have a little info to base my choice from. (for example, I'm not drafting a 6'2" 275# Center, even if he is top 3 in his group)
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]

Volson is meh, but I like him, and he has far exceeded my expectations

-Frank Booth 1/9/23
Reply/Quote
#62
(12-12-2024, 11:26 AM)SunsetBengal Wrote: Yeah, that's why I don't use that simulator. Having a full life and demanding job, I just don't have the time to learn and research the entire draft prospect field. The other simulators at least offer a bio, overview, and sometimes a meager scouting report. That way when I get to the names that I'm unfamiliar with, I can at least have a little info to base my choice from. (for example, I'm not drafting a 6'2" 275# Center, even if he is top 3 in his group)

I open another window and do a quick Google search from there.  It is definitely a downside to their sim.  I don't blame you.
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote
#63
Tanner Hudson still getting the love from PFF..
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote
#64
(12-12-2024, 01:31 PM)Essex Johnson Wrote: Tanner Hudson still getting the love from PFF..

He's not a bad player, just not that complete TE that is so highly coveted in the league. And, he fell out of favor with many around here when he dropped that TD pass.
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]

Volson is meh, but I like him, and he has far exceeded my expectations

-Frank Booth 1/9/23
Reply/Quote
#65
(12-12-2024, 01:45 PM)SunsetBengal Wrote: He's not a bad player, just not that complete TE that is so highly coveted in the league. And, he fell out of favor with many around here when he dropped that TD pass.

And fumbling right before the goal line in the opener...
Reply/Quote
#66
(12-11-2024, 11:17 PM)Nepa Wrote: The one time that McKinnley Jackson stood out to me was on a WR screen, where McKinnely Jackson took off after the fast receiver. He didn't tackle him, but he got to him just after he was tackled 10 yards past the line of scrimmage. In other words, Jackson was hustling his ass off trying to get the speedy receiver. It showed to me that he may have the right internal drive. That was not the case with Sweat and many physical specimens who never seemed to have the work ethic or passion. That's my hope, at least. If he has the work ethic and passion for football, he has the physical attributes.

Saw this as well. Nice seeing hustle out of the big man. He is far from trash.

Would like to see him make some TFL in the run game before season's end and gain some confidence for the future.

(12-11-2024, 11:22 PM)sandwedge Wrote: You will get to see Sweat this Sunday. I have only seen him play once so far, against the Chargers. He basically looked like a big blob that day...

Yep, Sweat can come across as a blob when he is constantly over weight. His work ethic is questionable at the very least.

I like that we drafted McKinnley and didn't reach for T'Vondre.
Reply/Quote
#67
(12-12-2024, 03:31 PM)Nate (formerly eliminate08) Wrote: Saw this as well. Nice seeing hustle out of the big man. He is far from trash.

Would like to see him make some TFL in the run game before season's end and gain some confidence for the future.


Yep, Sweat can come across as a blob when he is constantly over weight. His work ethic is questionable at the very least.

I like that we drafted McKinnley and didn't reach for T'Vondre.

Sweat has been solid so far this year,  Which means he'll look like prime Albert Haynesworth against our IOL.

But yeah, not a fan of taking a guy with his weight issues high. 
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote
#68
(12-12-2024, 03:35 PM)Whatever Wrote: Sweat has been solid so far this year,  Which means he'll look like prime Albert Haynesworth against our IOL.

But yeah, not a fan of taking a guy with his weight issues high. 

Good to know, haven't seen Sweat this year. I was for drafting him as well, but I honestly liked McKinnley better and thought the Titans 
was by far the bigger reach with his questions. We will see how both of these players look as the years go on. Kind of similar to Mims and
the other OT's that we were looking at before the Draft.
Reply/Quote
#69
(12-12-2024, 03:35 PM)Whatever Wrote: Sweat has been solid so far this year,  Which means he'll look like prime Albert Haynesworth against our IOL.

But yeah, not a fan of taking a guy with his weight issues high. 

The issue for Sweat has been his conditioning, work ethic, and off-the-field. When he plays, he is dominant. He's a huge man and strong and can move quite well. Heck, he won the Outland Trophy. I had my eye on him as someone who would be available in the draft to replace Reader.

But in the Texas-Washington playoff game, which Texas lost, he was so out of condition that he was sitting out obvious defensive stands when he was needed. He was too worn out to take the field, even in the short-yardage, obvious run plays. Then he got a DWI right before the draft, which was about as ridiculous as it gets. And Callahan called his conditioning early in the season "a work in progress."  It does seem that Callahan has him in pretty good shape and he's done well this season. But he did miss (I believe) the game last week (or was it the week before?) and was limited in practice this week, so I'm not sure we will even see Sweat on Sunday.
Reply/Quote
#70
(12-12-2024, 04:12 PM)Nepa Wrote: The issue for Sweat has been his conditioning, work ethic, and off-the-field. When he plays, he is dominant. He's a huge man and strong and can move quite well. Heck, he won the Outland Trophy. I had my eye on him as someone who would be available in the draft to replace Reader.

But in the Texas-Washington playoff game, which Texas lost, he was so out of condition that he was sitting out obvious defensive stands when he was needed. He was too worn out to take the field, even in the short-yardage, obvious run plays. Then he got a DWI right before the draft, which was about as ridiculous as it gets. And Callahan called his conditioning early in the season "a work in progress."  It does seem that Callahan has him in pretty good shape and he's done well this season. But he did miss (I believe) the game last week (or was it the week before?) and was limited in practice this week, so I'm not sure we will even see Sweat on Sunday.

Plus Sweat played next to Byron Murphy who was a stud and was my 2nd favorite choice in this last draft after Mims.

He now plays next to Simmons who is a stud as well. We will see if Sweat plays against us, I am interested in seeing how he does against crappy
Guards. Same with how McKinnley does as his rookie season goes on. I like who we picked.
Reply/Quote
#71
(12-10-2024, 03:40 PM)Joelist Wrote: The Geno Stone score jump was interesting also as they changed how they were using him. Lou let him attack a lot more and not sit back so much; could be that is how he plays best.

Don’t expect that a lot

I think we only did it cause Cooper Rush isn’t that good
-Housh
Reply/Quote
#72
(12-12-2024, 01:31 PM)Essex Johnson Wrote: Tanner Hudson still getting the love from PFF..

And again, he played 14 snaps out of 71 lol. Your fascination with him is odd. Guy is not worth a roster spot.
[Image: images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSEYP058YrTmvLTIxU4-rq...pMEksT5A&s]

[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]

Reply/Quote
#73
(12-12-2024, 09:01 PM)Nicomo Cosca Wrote: And again, he played 14 snaps out of 71 lol. Your fascination with him is odd. Guy is not worth a roster spot.

What's your point? He's a decent role player, as long as he stays cheap, I don't mind him being on the team. You can't use all of your tools all of the time, anyway.
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]

Volson is meh, but I like him, and he has far exceeded my expectations

-Frank Booth 1/9/23
Reply/Quote
#74
(12-12-2024, 09:16 PM)SunsetBengal Wrote: What's your point? He's a decent role player, as long as he stays cheap, I don't mind him being on the team. You can't use all of your tools all of the time, anyway.

I already made my point. He’s a career practice squad player who’s not worth a roster spot. I’d rather be getting a look at Tanner McLachlan if anything.

I swear, some of the players you guys like and get attached to for absolutely no reason (Volson, Hudson) is so weird lol.
[Image: images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSEYP058YrTmvLTIxU4-rq...pMEksT5A&s]

[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]

Reply/Quote
#75
(12-12-2024, 09:28 PM)Nicomo Cosca Wrote: I already made my point. He’s a career practice squad player who’s not worth a roster spot. I’d rather be getting a look at Tanner McLachlan if anything.

I swear, some of the players you guys like and get attached to for absolutely no reason (Volson, Hudson) is so weird lol.

It's not about getting attached to players for any sort of sentimental reason. It takes players at all ranges of the pay scale to make a roster, especially on a team with a handful of stars consuming a high percentage of the payroll. 
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]

Volson is meh, but I like him, and he has far exceeded my expectations

-Frank Booth 1/9/23
Reply/Quote
#76
It will be interesting to see what the Bengals do at TE in thr off-season. They got a taste of what an all-around TE could do for the offense in Erick All but the injury makes his future iffy. McLachlan looked like a Tanner Hudson cardboard cutout in his pre-draft process so I'm not expecting him to step in as a run blocker. Drew Sample is a solid role player but they need a guy that can play Y, F, and H-Back.

[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote
#77
(12-12-2024, 11:26 AM)SunsetBengal Wrote: Yeah, that's why I don't use that simulator. Having a full life and demanding job, I just don't have the time to learn and research the entire draft prospect field. The other simulators at least offer a bio, overview, and sometimes a meager scouting report. That way when I get to the names that I'm unfamiliar with, I can at least have a little info to base my choice from. (for example, I'm not drafting a 6'2" 275# Center, even if he is top 3 in his group)


Mock Draft Database doesn't actually have any draftniks they are just aggregate for all of the Big Boards and Mock Drafts. They aren't allowed to post other people's scouting reports on their site because of copyrights. 

This time of year all rhe simulators are useless though as the draft analysts watch tape and build boards.

[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote
#78
(12-13-2024, 11:04 AM)Synric Wrote: It will be interesting to see what the Bengals do at TE in thr off-season. They got a taste of what an all-around TE could do for the offense in Erick All but the injury makes his future iffy. McLachlan looked like a Tanner Hudson cardboard cutout in his pre-draft process so I'm not expecting him to step in as a run blocker. Drew Sample is a solid role player but they need a guy that can play Y, F, and H-Back.

I’d be pretty surprised if they don’t bring back Gesicki on a 1 or 2 year deal. Still need a complete TE though. Such a bummer about All. He looked so promising.
[Image: images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSEYP058YrTmvLTIxU4-rq...pMEksT5A&s]

[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]

Reply/Quote





Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)