Possible Terrorist attack at tOSU

[*bfine32*]

(11-29-2016, 12:07 PM)oncemoreuntothejimbreech Wrote: What is the problem?

The idealology that motivates an 18 year old kid to commit such an act.

[tigerseye]

Wish someone at OSU would have had a concealed carry and put this terrorist down quickly.

They will use any weapon (not just guns). We need to stop the lets disarm the law abiding citizens and limit their rights to own.

Islamic terrorists/murders/sharia/islamic radicals/ISIS/ISIL/crooks don't care about our laws. They don't follow laws. Attacking our 2nd Amendment rights only works to disarm the people who are being attacked, not the murdering scum who is doing the attacking.



This is globalism at work. They want to disarm the USA citizens. So they let trash in to kill our citizens, then cry to the citizens "we need your guns". Guns are the problem. What? No guns are not the problem but it can be part of the solution.

Anyone who wishes to disarm or limit ownership of the law abiding citizens of the USA is not looking out for the security of the USA. So what is their true motivation?

Globalists have admitted all along what they are doing. It is not a secret. They have been very open about it.DYODD.

The released Wikileaks from Podesta when he said after a terror attack that he wished it had been an American name being reported as the perpitrator instead of another Islam believer was very telling.

The globalists want to disarm the USA and they are using nut jobs twisted actions to try to do it. Don't fall for any of it.
Instead we should start to question and wonder what their true motivations are for wanting to attack the 2nd Amendment.

God Bless America

[*bfine32*]

(11-29-2016, 11:08 AM)GMDino Wrote: 1) Nope.  Just that a crazy guy with a gun seems to do more killing and faster.

2) What can be removed?  Religion?

3) As I said, I'll wait.

1) Family memebers of 86 dead in Nice France may disagree with your assertion; however, I had no idea this was a debate about guns. You're really going to lose Fred and Benton

2) Anything that motivates young adults to kill inicents

3) Your new found pragmatic approach is to be admired

[oncemoreuntothejimbreech]

(11-29-2016, 12:22 PM)bfine32 Wrote: The idealology that motivates an 18 year old kid to commit such an act.

Which is?

[*bfine32*]

(11-29-2016, 12:30 PM)oncemoreuntothejimbreech Wrote: Which is?

You are mistaking me for someone that is a member of a taskforce established to determine this.

Unlike a few on this board I don't have all the answers; however, I will be more than happy to provide suggestions if asked by those that are truly working toward a solution.

[GMDino]

(11-28-2016, 11:57 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Well he's not President yet. It will be interesting to see the opposing stances by the current POTUS and the future POTUS. 

My hope is that they both realize that the problem is NOT this 18 year old kid. 

(11-29-2016, 12:22 PM)bfine32 Wrote: The idealology that motivates an 18 year old kid to commit such an act.

(11-29-2016, 12:30 PM)oncemoreuntothejimbreech Wrote: Which is?

(11-29-2016, 12:32 PM)bfine32 Wrote: You are mistaking me for someone that is a member of a taskforce established to determine this.

Unlike a few on this board I don't have all the answers; however, I will be more than happy to provide suggestions if asked by those that are truly working toward a solution.

I think it was a fair question.  If you think some ideology motivated the attacker you probably have some idea or opinion on what that ideology is.  That doesn't mean you have all the answers, but you have a hunch on his motivation.

[oncemoreuntothejimbreech]

(11-29-2016, 12:32 PM)bfine32 Wrote: You are mistaking me for someone that is a member of a taskforce established to determine this.

If you can't give me an idea as to the type of ideology, how do you know it is an ideology?

Quote:Unlike a few on this board I don't have all the answers; however, I will be more than happy to provide suggestions if asked by those that are truly working toward a solution.

Well, no one here is working towards a solution so I guess you're done not speculating as to the unspecified "ideology" which you cannot identify which may or may not be the motivation.

[*bfine32*]

(11-29-2016, 12:41 PM)GMDino Wrote: I think it was a fair question.  If you think some ideology motivated the attacker you probably have some idea or opinion on what that ideology is.  That doesn't mean you have all the answers, but you have a hunch on his motivation.

Just tried to nip 20 questions in the bud at 2 and end another round of gotcha, but: The idealogy of Radical Islam and that somehow killing innocent people is a designed purpose.

[*bfine32*]

(11-29-2016, 12:50 PM)oncemoreuntothejimbreech Wrote: If you can't give me an idea as to the type of ideology, how do you know it is an ideology?


Well, no one here is working towards a solution so I guess you're done not speculating as to the unspecified "ideology" which you cannot identify which may or may not be the motivation.

You have no idea what anyone here is working toward. See above for your idealogy and the motivation for not providing it.

[oncemoreuntothejimbreech]

(11-29-2016, 12:52 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Just tried to nip 20 questions in the bud at 2 and end another round of gotcha, but: The idealogy of Radical Islam and that somehow killing innocent people is a designed purpose.

1  Was that so difficult?

2 Is Dino working towards a solution?

3 If Dino isn't working towards a solution, why are you giving him suggestions when you're not giving suggestions to people who aren't working towards a solution?

4  Didn't you previously argue religion isn't the problem, but rather the individuals?

[*bfine32*]

(11-29-2016, 01:05 PM)oncemoreuntothejimbreech Wrote: 1  Was that so difficult?

2 Is Dino working towards a solution?

3 If Dino isn't working towards a solution, why are you giving him suggestions when you're not giving suggestions to people who aren't working towards a solution?

4  Didn't you previously argue religion isn't the problem, but rather the individuals?

(11-29-2016, 12:52 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Just tried to nip 20 questions in the bud at 2 and end another round of gotcha,

We are up to 6.

3) Not difficult at all; I just knew where it would lead

4) I have no idea if Dino is working toward a solution

5) One does not have to be actively working toward a solution, but answering questions posed by someone whose only goal is to obtain a gotcha is a exercise in futility and one that I will cease with you after this post

6) I have always argued that the perverson of religion is a problem

[oncemoreuntothejimbreech]

(11-29-2016, 12:56 PM)bfine32 Wrote: You have no idea what anyone here is working toward. See above for your idealogy and the motivation for not providing it.

Really?  If we read the same posts from the same people and I have no idea what anyone here is working towards then neither do you.  Which begs the question, why would you claim you will provide suggestions as to the type of ideology responsible for this attack to those truly working towards a solution, if you and I don't have any idea who those people are?

[*bfine32*]

(11-29-2016, 01:15 PM)oncemoreuntothejimbreech Wrote: Really?  If we read the same posts from the same people and I have no idea what anyone here is working towards then neither do you.  Which begs the question, why would you claim you will provide suggestions as to the type of ideology responsible for this attack to those truly working towards a solution, if you and I don't have any idea who those people are?

7.

[oncemoreuntothejimbreech]

(11-29-2016, 01:15 PM)bfine32 Wrote: 7.

(11-28-2016, 11:33 PM)Vas Deferens Wrote: Trump didn't stop this?  Sad.  Weak.

(11-28-2016, 11:40 PM)Vas Deferens Wrote: Did he mention which signs he was re-pointing to?   Or what he believes constitutes 'domestic terrorism'?  Curious. 

(11-29-2016, 12:09 AM)Vas Deferens Wrote: Sure will.  Can you build a wall for that?  

(11-29-2016, 01:19 AM)Dill Wrote: Opposing stances regarding what?

(11-29-2016, 01:30 AM)Dill Wrote: One says the attack wasn't an attack? The other says it was?

What do you suppose they would oppose?

(11-29-2016, 01:46 AM)NATI BENGALS Wrote: Religion... Responsible for spreading so much happiness and joy.

Quick question, what perverts people more, religion, money, or government?

(11-29-2016, 11:08 AM)GMDino Wrote: 1) Nope.  Just that a crazy guy with a gun seems to do more killing and faster.

2) What can be removed?  Religion?

3) As I said, I'll wait.

How many questions is that?

[Millhouse]

Much praise to the police officer that was nearby that acted as quickly and decisively as he did. He is a hero in my book.

[Benton]

(11-29-2016, 12:26 PM)tigerseye Wrote:  

The globalists want to disarm the USA and they are using nut jobs twisted actions to try to do it. Don't fall for any of it.
 
 

How does someone using a car and a knife to commit violence support efforts to reduce firearms? Normally when something like this happens it increases gun sales, and gives the gun lobby more to bank on.

[*bfine32*]

(11-29-2016, 01:27 PM)oncemoreuntothejimbreech Wrote: How many questions is that?

8.

[fredtoast]

(11-29-2016, 01:41 PM)Benton Wrote: How does someone using a car and a knife to commit violence support efforts to reduce firearms? Normally when something like this happens it increases gun sales, and gives the gun lobby more to bank on.

This.

If this was staged by any special interest group it would be the gun lobby.  They would benefit the most from it.

But I don't believe it was staged by any special interest group.  Instead i think it was some radical individual obsessed with group identity and revenge.

Doesn't matter if it is a white supremacists killing black people in a Charleston church or a Muslim stabbing people in Columbus.  There are unbalanced people everywhere who channel their violent tendencies and thirst for revenge through a cause based on their race or religion.

[NATI BENGALS]

So he was worried what people would think of him and his religion if he prayed out in the open.

So he attempted to go on a killing spree in the name of his religion.

Makes sense.

[Benton]

(11-29-2016, 03:40 PM)NATI BENGALS Wrote: So he was worried what people would think of him and his religion if he prayed out in the open.

So he attempted to go on a killing spree in the name of his religion.

Makes sense.

We had a state trooper shot and killed here last year. The guy who shot him was very involved in trying to get BLM protesters to tone it down (he was a member) and focus on a message of working with police instead of against them. So the first time he gets pulled over, he runs from and then shoots a cop (who was just waiting while another officer was en route to escort the people in the car to a local hotel for the night since none of them had valid driver's licenses).

I'm finding it harder and harder to understand people.