08-05-2015, 11:32 AM
(08-05-2015, 11:30 AM)Rotobeast Wrote: I'm sorry, but I'm going to call BS on that.
I know half of these cats.
Look like savages to me.
![Ninja Ninja](http://i.imgur.com/4M0fBlK.gif)
![[Image: giphy.gif]](https://media0.giphy.com/media/1kwsTjL8BNqlszNtnCE/giphy.gif)
Your anger and ego will always reveal your true self.
The scientist who enjoys debating creationists
|
08-05-2015, 11:32 AM
(08-05-2015, 11:30 AM)Rotobeast Wrote: I'm sorry, but I'm going to call BS on that. Look like savages to me. ![]() ![]() Your anger and ego will always reveal your true self.
08-05-2015, 11:36 AM
08-05-2015, 11:43 AM
(08-05-2015, 10:31 AM)Beaker Wrote: First, the shroud of Turin is not a fossil. Plus you need a working knowledge of basic Mendelian genetics and statistical analysis. Also, Mendelian inheritance is "just a theory" which is so widely accepted people forget it is "just a theory." Along with germ theory.
08-05-2015, 11:57 AM
(08-05-2015, 10:43 AM)bfine32 Wrote: Yes, science can show how a bird became a "better bird" through fossil evidence and Natural Selection. Is there any evidence that shows a fossil transitioning from one species to modern day man? What do you consider transitional? Reptiles with avian features or birds with reptilian features? http://phenomena.nationalgeographic.com/2013/07/31/archeopteryxs-evolutionary-humuliation-continues/ How do you know god was uncreated?
08-05-2015, 12:01 PM
(08-05-2015, 11:36 AM)Rotobeast Wrote: Is that the theory as to why they died out ? Or did the white people conquer them?!?! ![]() ![]() Your anger and ego will always reveal your true self.
08-05-2015, 12:05 PM
08-05-2015, 12:06 PM
(08-05-2015, 11:31 AM)fredtoast Wrote: No thanks, for me that just takes all the fun out of debating. Not sure how much you are going to enjoy the final one. ![]() ![]()
08-05-2015, 12:29 PM
(08-05-2015, 10:43 AM)bfine32 Wrote: Yes, science can show how a bird became a "better bird" through fossil evidence and Natural Selection. Now youre beginning to get it. If you acknowledge that there are small transitions, then you also have to consider that many small transitions over extremely long periods of time can add up to large overall changes.
08-05-2015, 12:40 PM
08-05-2015, 12:48 PM
(08-04-2015, 11:00 PM)RASCAL Wrote: then why do we still have apes? why aren't they developing into humans today?? Humans are great apes, but the reason why we have primates that are not human is because different environments encourage the continuation of different traits. They fit into their environment just as we fit into ours. Why did some turtles evolve to be aquatic while others live on the land? (08-04-2015, 11:30 PM)RASCAL Wrote: I thought you said that man comes from apes. I guess I was wrong! We are apes. ![]() ![]()
08-05-2015, 01:10 PM
(08-04-2015, 11:29 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Look. Jesus fossil. (08-05-2015, 10:43 AM)bfine32 Wrote: Yes, science can show how a bird became a "better bird" through fossil evidence and Natural Selection. Is there any evidence that shows a fossil transitioning from one species to modern day man? For starters, that's not a fossil. Also, if the Shroud is authentic, it still doesn't provide any evidence for creationism. You're also right that birds have become "better birds". Likewise, humans, a primate, have become better primates than their predecessors. There's both fossil evidence of numerous hominids that demonstrate transitioning and evidence in humans of organs and other parts of the human body that demonstrate evolution. Unless you're suggesting we were designed to have useless organs and muscles present in other animals.. ![]() ![]()
08-05-2015, 01:50 PM
(08-04-2015, 11:29 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Look. Jesus fossil. Look. Evolution. ![]() ![]() ![]() Your anger and ego will always reveal your true self.
08-05-2015, 02:35 PM
(08-05-2015, 12:48 PM)BmorePat87 Wrote: Humans are great apes, but the reason why we have primates that are not human is because different environments encourage the continuation of different traits. They fit into their environment just as we fit into ours. Why did some turtles evolve to be aquatic while others live on the land? Well.....all turtles by definition all turtles are technically aquatic....otherwise they'd be a tortoise ![]()
08-05-2015, 02:53 PM
08-05-2015, 04:52 PM
(08-05-2015, 02:35 PM)RoyleRedlegs Wrote: Well.....all turtles by definition all turtles are technically aquatic....otherwise they'd be a tortoise Not in 'Merica. Ok, Let's be zoologists. Why are sea turtles different from semi aquatic turtles like my red ear sliders? ![]() ![]()
08-05-2015, 05:38 PM
08-05-2015, 06:44 PM
08-05-2015, 07:12 PM
(08-05-2015, 02:35 PM)RoyleRedlegs Wrote: Well.....all turtles by definition all turtles are technically aquatic....otherwise they'd be a tortoise I know biologists that would tell you that all tortoises are turtles, but not all turtles are tortoises. ![]()
"A great democracy has got to be progressive, or it will soon cease to be either great or a democracy..." - TR
"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little." - FDR
08-05-2015, 07:14 PM
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|