3 years in a row now the Bengals trade back in the second...Mixon then Jessie Bates.
Edit: Mock accordingly in 2020 lol.
So Risner may have been their guy.
36 more 6th rounders. Bad idea.
(04-26-2019, 08:54 PM)t3r3e3 Wrote: [ -> ]Looks that way. And the Broncos did the Bengals dirty anyway
It was actually Denver, I saw Det after Denver and thought they traded
This trade back tells me we wanted Risner or one of the OL guys taken already.
at least we didnt get the commercials.. take THAT Commish! haahaha
(04-26-2019, 08:54 PM)pally Wrote: [ -> ]we got picks 52, 125, 182 from Broncos
another 4th for a total of 2 and 2 more 6th round picks.
Definitely gonna be moving up later on now
(04-26-2019, 08:55 PM)TKUHL Wrote: [ -> ]This trade back tells me we wanted Risner or one of the OL guys taken already.
Ot Denver wanted Risner and Lock
(04-26-2019, 08:54 PM)pally Wrote: [ -> ]we got picks 52, 125, 182 from Broncos
another 4th for a total of 2 and 2 more 6th round picks.
Why do we want all these late ass picks?
(04-26-2019, 08:54 PM)jj22 Wrote: [ -> ]What did we get?!
we got picks 52, 125, 182 from Broncos
another 4th for a total of 2 and 2 more 6th round picks
I could see us trading back up with some of those 6 rounders
(04-26-2019, 08:56 PM)Crazyjdawg Wrote: [ -> ]Why do we want all these late ass picks?
Affordability.

(04-26-2019, 08:54 PM)pally Wrote: [ -> ]we got picks 52, 125, 182 from Broncos
another 4th for a total of 2 and 2 more 6th round picks.
Yuck. We don’t need more low round picks. I guess there’s no one we’ll really want in the next 10 picks?
We have 7 sixth round picks?

6th round is going to be epic
Boom! An extra 4th! I'm going to be soooo stuck to my phone during my kids' soccer tomorrow.
Trading back was a good move here. My guess was we had targeted Risner or Ford - once both were gone no reason to stay there so get more picks and ones that are prior to the sixth round.
(04-26-2019, 08:54 PM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: [ -> ]Why trade down? You already aren't going to have your 11 picks make the team. Why bother getting 12 or 13?
They need less and better picks rather than a mountain of garbage picks.
I question that at 125 there is a garbage pick.. .. we probably did not see value in 42 pick.. to what we would take with 52.. I like the move
I hope we make noise tomorrow or in the 3rd even with all these late picks
(04-26-2019, 08:57 PM)Joelist Wrote: [ -> ]Trading back was a good move here. My guess was we had targeted Risner or Ford - once both were gone no reason to stay there so get more picks and ones that are prior to the sixth round.
IF we had wanted Risner or Ford, we should have negotiated to get them... :paul: :paul: :paul: