Mallett > Ben

[MrRager]

(12-27-2015, 10:29 PM)BFritz21 Wrote: #1 Why else wouldn't Pat like him?  The test was proven to be bogus, and, even if he mistakingly drank from a contaminated water bottle, he never failed any other tests when his teammates did.  Lots of teachers, and even intellectual people who aren't teachers, don't like great athletes who are also smart because they're jealous.  They don't like that someone can be that smart and also be amazing at sports, especially if they don't try and do well in school.

#2  It's usually only when people use previous comments of mine, that are completely unrelated to the current discussion, like it somehow is a valid argument in the current situation.  It's also only a few people, not every poster (I also say it when people exaggerate, as you did there).

#3  I never once said that it was being suppressed by our government, so how can you claim to have a valid argument when you just throw out complete bullshit?

P.S.  I don't think it's every week (pretty sure), but feel free to point them out because, if it's so common, they'll be easy to find.

See, that's why I say people don't take someone seriously because no one should when they just post complete bullshit.

Well, I can't speak for Pat, but can give you a general answer: Some people dislike trash talkers and prefer watching players like Larry Fitz. His antics get annoying. That has zero to do with being upset that a person is smart and athletic. Like they aren't related at all. That's just one reason not to like him that has nothing to do with his athleticism. This should be obvious.  

I guess I just kinda inferred that from this thread and this one. I really don't think I'm reaching on a limb here.

And holy shit man you need to learn to not take every single word so literally. Sure it wasn't exactly every single week, but clearly I just said that to make a point. You have started 1, 2, 3, 4, Hill threads in the last month alone. That's more than one a week of late.